Whoops! – Where does that leave me writing my blog at ‘mal’-ipunations!!! What are ‘ipunations’ anyway? Phew! I think it’s OK because malipunations is just a made up word!
A recent British study suggests that with rising obesity rates millions of Britons may also be suffering from ‘mal’-nutrition.
The prefix ‘mal’ in ‘mal’-nutrition is from the French word ‘mal’ meaning just about anything bad.
‘Mal’-nutrition has been on my radar for some time because it’s not just in third world countries anymore, it’s on our doorstep.
Nutrition has always been on my radar but it got higher on my personal list (not just on my list for my children) when I had severe PMS and attended a programme in Miami run by a lady doctor who also had PMS – how wise she was!
What I remember most from her very useful talks, covering more than just diet, is the statement “lettuce is not a green vegetableâ€!! In other words, despite the fact that you may eat salad every day there isn’t much nutrition going into your body! You actually need real green vegetables!
You won’t notice toddlers who are still nursing at 2 years old (their mothers have to be more circumspect) but you will see a lot of two year olds still on their bottles. Many are in fact surviving only on many bottles of cow’s milk each day. There’s a big difference in the nutritional values of breast milk and cow’s milk.
Most breastfed 2 year olds are actually weaning themselves and taking portions of real food during the day and they tend to lose all their plumpness once they start walking at about a year.
Those bottle fed babies ‘look’ fine, in many cases they don’t look obese, they may still have baby fat though. Unless you pick up a child who was bottle-fed for a long time you won’t realise how solid, heavy or dense they feel – I think their bones are heavier than in breastfed babies. Just another theory. But they probably look good on the graph of height and weight that pediatricians keep to reassure themselves and parents they are doing a good job!
We are reaching a second or third generation that has been ‘mal’-nourished – they all look pretty good, if somewhat overweight – check out all those potbellies. Regrettably I have known many affluent middle class families where the adults and children have no concept of nutrition. I don’t pretend to have done the best job with my own children, but I do think they understand what constitutes good nutrition.
Is it surprising that the granddaughter of a woman who never cooks had never seen an apple until she was shown one by her caregiver when she was 16 months old? The granddaughter still shows social and other delays at nearly 6 years of age. What I also recall is that as a behavioural challenge to her family this child was seldom if ever taken to a supermarket, never mind that the parents never bought fruit because they didn’t eat it themselves!
Is it surprising that the kitchen is still gated off in a household with a 2 year old and a 4 year old? The 2 year old is still just having bottles of cow’s milk every day – very little in the way of real food. Did I mention that both children in this family have language delays and the oldest has behavioural issues too?
In another household the children will ask for an apple or yogurt as evening snacks and they know where to find them in the fridge. There are no developmental delays in this household.
Could there be a connection between developmental/behavioural delays and ‘mal’-nutrition?
Would you think problem child/behavioural issues if you saw a 3 or 4 year old licking the edge of the meat counter in your local supermarket or would you think problem parent/behavioural issues when you saw and heard her mother yell at her to stop? Or both?
I think ‘mal’-nutrition just reflects a parent’s lack of interest in and attention to their child’s growth and development; just like ‘mal’-behaviours (except that isn’t a real word – perhaps it should be?). Perhaps we should start another new word ‘mal’-parenting.
My assertion is that there is a correlation between ‘mal’-nutrition and obesity and developmental delays. The problem is that ‘mal’-nutrition doesn’t necessarily show up these days in its traditional form in the pediatrician’s office.
I’m sure the picture that comes to mind with the word ‘mal’-nutrition is someone who looks anorexic. But ‘mal’-nutrition is something as simple as a well meaning parent of a child with autism getting their child to take his vitamins – with a cup of lemon/lime soda!! Pretty oxymoronic behaviour from a nurse (the mother’s profession!)
Traditionally one thinks of ‘mal’-nutrition only being in lower socioeconomic groups or third world countries, but four of the five families mentioned here are all affluent middle class ‘living the good life’ and the parents are college graduates.
In my opinion, and experience, good nutrition affects the daily outcomes in all populations from infants to autism spectrum, to Down’s syndrome, to stroke patients in their 90’s, those with Alzheimer’s in their 90’s, and adult rehab patients.
Good nutrition positively and quickly affects brain function and behaviour in all ages, disabilities and all countries.
Let’s get ‘mal’ out of our vocabulary.